User:316way/sandbox

Social realism and textual rationalism
Text generated from the Postmodernism Generator located here/Pomo

1. Poststructuralist deappropriation and cultural discourse
If one examines cultural discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject textual rationalism or conclude that consciousness is intrinsically a legal fiction. But the within/without distinction which is a central theme of Stone’s Heaven and Earth emerges again in JFK, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

“Class is impossible,” says Derrida; however, according to Wilson Debord suggests the use of textual postdialectic theory to challenge hierarchy. However, in Natural Born Killers, Stone analyses social realism; in Platoon, although, he reiterates cultural discourse.

Foucault’s essay on social realism implies that society, paradoxically, has objective value, but only if reality is equal to art. But Bataille uses the term ‘Debordist situation’ to denote the common ground between reality and sexual identity.

Any number of theories concerning the futility of cultural society exist. However, the subject is contextualised into a textual rationalism that includes art as a paradox.

Lyotard promotes the use of social realism to analyse and read sexual identity. Therefore, the economy, and eventually the absurdity, of neomodernist narrative depicted in Stone’s Heaven and Earth is also evident in Natural Born Killers.

2. Stone and cultural discourse
In the works of Stone, a predominant concept is the distinction between ground and figure. Bataille suggests the use of Foucaultist power relations to deconstruct the status quo. Thus, Hamburger

The primary theme of the works of Rushdie is not, in fact, theory, but pretheory. The premise of textual rationalism implies that expression is created by the collective unconscious. In a sense, Debord uses the term ‘the dialectic paradigm of consensus’ to denote the role of the poet as participant.

The main theme of Geoffrey’s[3] analysis of textual rationalism is the difference between class and sexual identity. Thus, if cultural discourse holds, we have to choose between social realism and semanticist rationalism.

Lyotard’s model of textual rationalism states that the task of the reader is social comment. However, Baudrillard promotes the use of postcapitalist narrative to modify language.

Marx uses the term ‘cultural discourse’ to denote the role of the participant as poet. In a sense, many discourses concerning social realism may be revealed.

3. Textual rationalism and dialectic precapitalist theory
“Class is fundamentally meaningless,” says Sontag; however, according to d’Erlette[4], it is not so much class that is fundamentally meaningless, but rather the defining characteristic of class. Social realism implies that discourse must come from communication. It could be said that Porter[5] holds that we have to choose between deconstructive objectivism and neocultural desemanticism.

A number of discourses concerning not narrative per se, but prenarrative exist. However, the subject is interpolated into a dialectic precapitalist theory that includes consciousness as a reality.

If Foucaultist power relations holds, we have to choose between dialectic precapitalist theory and dialectic theory. It could be said that Lacan’s essay on social realism suggests that the purpose of the observer is deconstruction, given that Sontagist camp is valid.

Lyotard suggests the use of social realism to challenge outmoded, elitist perceptions of sexual identity. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a dialectic precapitalist theory that includes culture as a whole.