User:34adel/Bonanno crime family/P!neapp13 Peer Review

General info
(34adel)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Bonanno crime family
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(It seems like you have a clear idea of what you want the article to look like.

You are cutting a lot of the original article, I would suggest making sure that every cut you make is necessary.

The current article has many photos, I'm not sure if they're relevant because I haven't closely read the article, but they definitely adds to it. Are you going to continue to use these or find replacements?

Are there photos that aren't of people that could be used? )

Peer review 2:

The historical leadership section is confusing and hard to read. It might be better at the end of the page.

Why are current members above past members? this might work better chronologically

It seems like you have an organized plan for working on this project, this will be helpful moving forward.

This page is long and confusing, the cuts seem necessary.