User:3milysk15/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
"Immigrant Health Care In The United States"

(Provide a link to the article here.)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigrant_health_care_in_the_United_States

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this specific article because it is related to my major, and I was interested in the information it provided.

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I chose this article because it related to my major which is nursing, and I was interested in the information that it will be provided based on the title. The article matters because it is a big problem happening in the United States today, and I felt it was going to give valuable information but I know it is not a perfect article and I was interested in seeing what can be added, fixed, or removed.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Throughout the article I found many good points, and I found some issues as well. Some good points were the majority of the information provided was relevant to the topic and some of the data that was given was up to date. Some issues I found were that the majority of the data that was provided was relatively old and could very well be different now. Some information given was not relevant specifically to the topic and could very well catch the reader off guard. The article stayed neutral and it explained different races, and men and woman as well. After reading I think that the information provided was a lot to take in. It had many good points but some of the information was repetitive, I felt that the article was overrepresented with information. After reading research based sentences I checked a few citations to make sure they worked and were reliable and they all opened and showed information Again, some of the information was out of date and as old as about 20 years, the author could have given more information from dates that are relatively new. Overall, I believe this article reaches its intended audience, and provides a lot of information on their topic, I think that the author should sum up some of their viewpoints and that way there is no repetition of the same information, and to add details that is up to date.