User:412DRS/Cosmo Kramer/NSB5203 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * 412DRS
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Cosmo Kramer 
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cosmo Kramer

Evaluate the drafted changes
The information being added seems to be up to date especially since the show is no longer running. The lead section is not overly detailed and explains the article well. All content is relevant and a good add to the article. First source is a Wiki fandom which can be edited by anyone and is not a reliable source. Screen rant could be used as a source because of it is widely used, but other editors might find it questionable. Other sources seem to be reliable and trustworthy. The content is neutral and because it is a fictional character, I don't see how it can be biased or persuade a reader. I think adding a new section as stated in the bibliography would be beneficial to the overall flow of the article and reorganizing some parts may make the information clearer to the reader. Being that it is a fictional character there may not be a lot of information you can add but adding sections such as his best quotes would improve the information and give a better understanding of the character.