User:412DRS/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cosmo Kramer - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because Seinfeld is my favorite TV show and Kramer is my favorite character. I also have been very interested in movie and tv show character reviews.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section is a little long, but describes the overview well

Background and family section provided a lot of information but was very unorganized.

Personality section is way too long as it talks about other topics

Inspiration section is good, talks about how the character and came about and the background of the actor

Surnames section gives a good history of what the character has been referred to in the years of the show

Employment section provides a background of how the character got money his whole life

Content-few sections are long, but covers so many aspects of the character. Article points out which episodes the character showed his traits

Article is very neutral, no bias at all, only provides facts

Article is difficult to read, tough to follow, could be more organized