User:45.50.189.53/Evaluate an Article

After reading the article I do believe it does relate to the article topic; it clearly talks about what has happened in the colonial period. One thing that did distract me was some of the grammar in the first paragraph, I feel as though that should be fixed. None of the information on the article is out of date and I do not believe anything is missing from the article. Personally I think that the article does not need improving, I like how everything is categorized and everything that should be bolded is bolded. This article is neutral and does not contain any claims that could be heavily biased towards a particular position. I feel as though the viewpoints in this article are underrepresented. the links do work in the article and the sources do support the claim as well. Each fact is referenced with a reliable and appropriate reference. The information comes from a reliable source. These are neutral sources and are not biased. After looking at the "talk" page, I have not read anything about someone posting on how to represent the topic of the article. The article is not rated very high, and is apart of three WikiProjects. I actually feel as though this article talks about the topic almost like how I have learned it in class, which is pleasant.