User:5150EditWiki/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Implicit bias training

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I find the topic of unconscious bias to be interesting. I found this article and noticed multiple banners explaining possible problems within the article. I noticed that rewording can be used to simplify or properly state facts and to avoid personal opinions seen in the article. The sources ranged from 4-23 years old and can be updated with more recent information.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) The lead section does not provide an overview of the major sections within the article itself. The references, although contain valid and useful information, are not all current. The article can be difficult to read, containing large paragraphs of information with a reference at the end. The article contains no images. The article is of low interest to three separate WikiProjects and has a rating of C. The talk page contains possible improvements but no in-depht discussions.

The criticism section is unorganized, does not flow smoothly, and lacks detail. There is no expansion upon the criticism references and is underrepresented.

Following References are not entered correctly or are unavailable:


 * 1) Johnson, I. R., Kopp, B. M., Petty, R. E. (2018). "Just say no! (and mean it): Meaningful negation as a tool to modify automatic racial attitudes". Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 88–110.doi:10.17117/1368430216647189


 * 1) Kawakami, K., Dovido, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000). "Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation". Journal of Personality and Psychology, 78(5), 871–888. doi:10.1037//O022-3514.78.5.871

I believe the article is underdeveloped and can be updated grammatically. The article is not fully balanced and can use improvement in the criticism section. The references need to be updated and corrected as well to reflect the information within the article.