User:518quinn/Études des mouvements à Paris (1927)/Mckewill Peer Review

The Lead has been updated and includes a strong introductory sentence that describes the article's topic. It doesn't necessarily have a brief description of the article's sections, but suggests them which I think does the job. The content is very relevant to the topic and I liked the Themes and Interpretations section especially, as it's something you wouldn't see in every Wikipedia film article. If there's anything that's missing it might be a synopsis or plot summary, but there is already a sentence about it in the first paragraph so I don't think it's necessary. All of the claims are unbiased and backed up with a plethora of sources. It is concise and organized into easy-to-read, short paragraphs. The article is supported by four sources, so it meets Wikipedia's Notability requirements. Overall, I thought the content added was very strong and gives the reader a sense of what the production of the film was like and also what the themes of the film are. In other words, it does a great job at providing objective and subjective facts, and even backs up the subjective facts with references and definitions. One thing I think could be added, even just to organize it, would be the box template to show the director, writer, et cetera. The article already states this, but to make your life easier you could put all that information in a box too. Either way, I think it's up to you and the article is looking good!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)