User:56ap12/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Frankenweenie (2012 film)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article since I am interested in animated film as a film major student, and I have been to Tim Burton exhibition this summer who is the director of Frankenweenie. I wanted to explore more about animated film through this exercise with the one I already know. My preliminary impression of it was it has good content list and introduction to let the viewers know the basic information of this film.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section clearly has the introduction of this film and brief description of the major contents. All the information in the lead has included in the article and it is pretty concise. The content is relevant to the topic and does belong to the article and topic well. I don't see specific biased tone or claims in this article and all images are well-captioned. They are visually appealing and enhance the understanding of the topic. There are good amount of secondary sources that are reliable such as articles and film score websites to discuss about critical responses. There are lots of websites like this, so it may reduce the doubt to its fairness. Links worked well and the sources are current in regards of the release date of the film. I could see the active talk page about this article and how the Wikipedians communicate and advise to each other. There are some comments about misspelling, advice for splitting the section of the content, and external links added. Overall, this article looks good and clearly delivers the information about the film. I think it would be nice to have more detailed information about the production section.