User:5734hls/Scarab (artifact)/Itsnotironic Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

5734hls


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:5734hls/Scarab (artifact) - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Scarab (artifact) - Wikipedia

Lead:
You seem to have mistakenly moved the 'historical development' heading up to the very top, thereby declassifying the lead as a lead.

Content:
Excellently done. Content is clear, in-depth but concise, just very well put-together.

Tone and balance:
Also well done. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.

Sources and References:
Sources also look mostly good, all respectable institutions. However, I notice that you have included a source more than a century old. Maybe look for a more recent source for this information?

Organization:
The aforementioned mistake with the 'historical development' heading needs to be corrected. Also, in copying over the sections you seem to have kept the '[edit]' tag at the end of each header. Should be easy fixes!

Images and Media:
The images currently available in the article are all good. I assume they'll be transferred over to your edit in due time. I'd consider adding a few more, mainly one or two depicting scarab rings, as this seems to be the only segment that doesn't have accompanying images.

Overall Impressions:
Excellent! Just needs those finishing touches to polish it up and make it sing. All in all, well done.