User:63.228.208.186/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Choi Seung-hee Yes, most of the things in the article was relevant to the article topic. It was neutral. Article gave readers a decision to think if she was pro-Japanese or not. Most of her work and about her life when she was in North Korea is underrepresented in the article. Probably, due to lack of resource materials. There were total two links and only one of them worked. And one working link was only accessible to the certain people, so I couldn't access to the full material through the link. There aren't any appropriate, reliable references on the article. (One working link was not accessible for me at least.) Article needs to find better references. Choi Seung-hee is official classified as pro-Japanese in Korea. And there is one young girl who are inheriting Choi Seung-hee style dancing from the former student of Choi Seung-hee. There was one user asking about the term used in the article. Sometimes people will just translate and use inappropriate word from the dictionary. It is not part of any WikiProjects. Article is not rated and ii is at Start status. Article didn't cover any of her dance work and didn't mention any reason why she was famous and popular at the time.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?