User:66.219.235.108/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Veterans Day
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I visited many world war I sights this summer and learned of the significance of the poppy on armistice day throughout the United Kingdom. I desired to learn about the significance of this holiday in America and how we celebrate it.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? potentially

Content evaluation
very concise, could use more information

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? almost all
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?: No, many sources come from newspapers not scholarly sources
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? not that I caught
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes but not very many points

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no
 * Are images well-captioned? yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? fixing poorly sourced, and agenda seeking statements
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? I cannot see a rating. Yes
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? focused on trivial matters such as use of apostrophe

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? low
 * What are the article's strengths? includes history
 * How can the article be improved? needs more scholarly sources
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? underdeveloped

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: