User:715short/The Spanish Tragedy/Isabelap03 Peer Review

General info
AliveTurtle0, Hummingbird Hue, 715short
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:715short/The_Spanish_Tragedy?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):The Spanish Tragedy

Evaluate the drafted changes
These additions are extremely intriguing and relevant to the content of the article. They are clear and easy to follow, and they manage to provide large portions of new information without overwhelming the reader. The added historical context and exploration of spectacle within in the play is a nice touch, with the section remaining fairly objective in providing perspectives for interpretation of images such as the hanged corpse and the theatrical element of not just the play itself, but the reactions of the characters within it as well. The history provided in the subsequent section regarding the play's influences does an incredible job contextualizing it within a larger theatrical and literary tradition. The section outlining the roles of torture and summary justice is similarly informative and captivating, providing more connections between the events of the play and historical details from the assumed time period its creation. Because these additions are already so well-crafted, there isn't much, if anything, that I would recommend editing. However, if you have time (and your sources allow), you could consider including more information from the second source listed under the "Spectacle" section, just so that the distribution of source incorporations is more evenly spread out. I'd also exercise caution in making assertions about Thomas Kyd's motivations regarding his choices to include certain elements as the play's author, perhaps reframing them as possible interpretations (or those of later theatrical scholars/enthusiasts). This comment can be disregarded if you have substantial enough evidence to back that he would endorse those claims, though. Overall, extremely thorough additions and great work!