User:716jrogers/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Lexicon

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article since it relates to my class on Linguistics. It is important since it is a key concept that we are learning in class. This article seems very well written with no mistakes and good citations.

Evaluate the article
There is a lead section that includes a brief definition of lexicon that relates to the article. There is also a description of the article in the lead section which includes compound words. It seems very detailed and may have to be edited to summarized a bit more. The article is definitely related to the article topic of lexicons and also has information that is relevant to the main topic. The article doesn't really relate to Wikipedia's equity gaps or areas of underrepresentation. The article is written in an informative point of view and doesn't seem to contain any persuasive or bias information. There are numerous sources with working links but some do seem to be old and potentially outdated. There are statements missing a source that should be verified for accuracy. The article is well written with no grammatical errors. There are no images present in this article. In the talk page, there are mentions about some of the definitions being slightly changed and additional sources should be added. Overall, the article is well written with a lot of relevant information. I think the lead section could be improved to better discuss what is further explored in the article. I also think that additional relevant sources can be used to better strengthen the article.