User:7mood575/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Renaissance art

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason for me selecting this article is the interest I have in art history subject. I took courses in art history earlier and I specifically like Renaissance art moment. It is an important article as it discusses medieval artistic moments which impacted the modern world in a huge way. I think it will be useful to evaluate this article as I already have some interest and knowledge in the subject. My preliminary impression is that the article is organized well with separate topics, pictures, and media. It provided multiple reliable sources and looked like a good source of information.

Evaluate the article
The lead section does a good job in introducing the topic well including all ideas and major sections of the article in a clear and concise manner. All the content in the article is up to date and relevant to the topic. It discusses the sections and ideas according to their importance and I found no irrelevant discussion in the article. The tone of the article is simple and neutral. It does not focus heavily on any topic and stay balanced. The tone is dedicated only to information giving and not persuasion. The topics are represented according to their value and the importance they carried throughout history. Most of the sources in the article are reliable, current, and reflect the literature to a good depth. The spectrum of the authors also looks diverse including researchers, historians, and different types of authors. But I also found one link not working currently and another link looked a bit random and unreliable. But the majority of the sources are great in-depth and credible. The organization of the article is so good as it is divided into sections with important topics and without any grammatical or spelling errors making it easy to read and understand. The well-captioned images in the article are appealing and help us understand the topics while they also follow Wikipedia’s copyright regulations. The discussions on the Talk page are engaging as the editors talk about historic details, the article’s organization, its purpose, necessary additions, removals, and many more. The article is rated a C-Class and has been a part of two WikiProjects: WikiProject Visual arts and WikiProject Italy. I felt that the overall status of the article is good, accurate, and useful. Organization and Tone are strengths of the article while it can be improved in updating its sources by adding more reliable sources and removing the outdated ones. The article is well developed and well-edited over time.