User:7ommybo1228/Hou Yaowen/Yuweij Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

7ommybo1228


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:7ommybo1228/Hou Yaowen
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hou Yaowen

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The author added the lead. And, the lead briefly introduces the actor to the viewers, which is clear and concise. However, the author can consider to expand the lead for a bit, allowing viewers have a comprehensive understanding at first glance.

Content

The content is fresh and relates to the topic. It is easy for the viewers to understand.

Tone and Balance

The tone is neutral and unbiased. After viewing the content, I personally don't have any favor. So, I would say the content is objective.

Sources and References

There are some sources from the press, so I'm not sure these are reliable or not. And, I open the third reference's link but it shows page not found. So, the author may need to spend more time on this section.

Organization

The content added well-written without any spelling errors. The only thing that can be improved is the structure. The author can create more sub-sections such as achievement, story, etc. to make the page more organized. As a viewer, I notice the content is comprehensive but bit overwhelm since all the information is under one section.

Images and Media

The author hasn't add any image yet.

For New Articles

The article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. It also contains infoboxes, section headings, and links to other articles.

Overall impression

The article gives a nice start, precisely introduces the actor. To improve the article, the author can work on making more sub-sections, and adding more images and reliable references.