User:808TR777/Single-player video game/Kev2kus Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (808TR777)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Single-player video game

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? The lead exactly demonstrates what the article will be about.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? The article begins with the definition of single player video game so yes it clearly describes the article topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The lead does not appear to have a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, everything seems to be in line.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Besides not having a brief description of the major sections, the lead is concise as it does provide a brief introduction of the article.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes the contents are related to video games.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? The content range from 10 years ago to two year ago.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All the content seems to relate to the article.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No, this article is about video games so topics relating to underrepresented populations does not apply.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes the article takes a neutral stance.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, there is no bias in this article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No viewpoints are overrepresented or underrepresented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the information is not persuasive.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes the sources seems fine.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes the sources reflect the article.
 * Are the sources current? No so much, the most recent is 2018.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? The sources are video game sources, so it does not include historically marginalized individuals.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, it is clear and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, the content added seems fine.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes the content is well organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media (No the peer did not added any images or media)


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
'''If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above. (The article is not a new article)'''


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The article seems to be well rounded and captures the basic understanding of single player video games.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The contents add more information to the article.
 * How can the content added be improved? Maybe add some pictures to showcase some examples of single player video games to provide some nice visuals.

Overall evaluation
Overall, the article seems like a well rounded one that highlights the basic points of single player video games. For someone that wants general information on single player video games, this article would provide a great starting point for them.