User:855Quilly/Khokhloma/Ceelle21 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

855Quilly


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:855Quilly/Khokhloma
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: well written, summary is sufficient for topic.

Content: relevant to topic, descriptive information available is good, accessible information and easily readable, no images added. Images could potentially help support the content of the article.

Tone: Topic is something that is underrepresented.

Sources: There may be complications finding sources that are available to us as far as research goes since it is a Russian topic. More up to date sources might be nice.

Overall: Additions help the article as it was very bare before. Descriptive language helps contextualize subject matter. Addition of quality sources helps ensure properly cited and factual information.