User:911skittles/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
WikiProject Food and drink

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article as I am very interested in nutrition, especially that I am very interested in my body-image and suffering from body dysmorphia. I think this article will provide me with more information about food and drinks that will aware of of the benefits/disadvantages of each type of food.

Evaluate the article
The introduction of this article was clearly defining the context of the article, this article is specialized in a project that is concerned with several topics that are related to food and drinks, such as cuisines and national dishes, chefs and food vendors, and types of food that is in restaurants.

The introduction was not detailed enough, however this is predictable as this topic was included to Wikipedia in 2003, moreover this topic does not need detailed introduction as it is not scientific. However, a lot of information was detailed further-on.

The objections and goals of the article are well-defined, the project is responsible to engage in the creation, expansion and maintenance of articles that are interested in this topic. Also, they are responsible to give recommendations to writers.

A statistic was provide later on which showed that according to 500 articles, 58.4% were considered to be  good articles and 9.6% of featured articles. This proves that the topics are taken very seriously.

In addition, the article has clearly defined several ways to make contributors and editors contribute in the article, and clearly stated: " The editors and contributors to Wikipedia are the core of this project. Without you, we cannot reach our goal of becoming the premier site on the web for Food and Drink-related information! ". This is a strong evidence that Wikipedia is not bias towards any party and is not trying to manipulate its users.

The tone of the article was neutral, it was clearly not an attempt to secretly promote an individual for his work, all points were discussed fairly and no manipulation attempt was detected while analyzing the article.

All of the sources provided were relevant to the topic, up-to-date and was categorized into criterias, some were in need to deletion, merged, be split or for creation. All of the articles were new, the oldest was from October 22,2020 and the most recent was at February 5,2021. This is a very strong indicator that the information provided in the article are accurate as  no old sources were used.

Furthermore, the structure was very organized and it was very easy to navigate through the article, a lot of photos were used as well which made the article look more organized and attractive.

However, as the talk-page of was not activated by the writers, I was not able to evaluate this part. Due to the absence of the talk-page, I think choosing another article will be better to make better communication with other editors and contributors.