User:99rebound/Local differential privacy/Penguinblueberry Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

99rebound


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:99rebound/Local_differential_privacy?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Local differential privacy

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, but i think the history and applications sections could be added more significantly into the lead of the article.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, but sentence is a bit unclear and should be shortened.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * I think that some of the details in the lead could be supplemented - I explained above.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes. Maybe the article should include a series of criticisms that the technology has received.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Most of the articles are fairly new & reliable. The one's from 2014/2017 should maybe be updated.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Some of the hyper links to people do not work -- there are not wikipedia articles for these people.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Not that I noticed
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * I'm not sure if you should title a section - ε-local differential privacy. Is there a simpler way to tag this? Perhaps if you are including it in your article you should do more introduction of the topic in the intro just to make it a bit more clear.
 * I am confused by the difference of applications and deployment in the article. Wouldn't these be the same thing?