User:A.pink236/sandbox

Articles of Interest

 * Waterborne diseases
 * Sustainable sanitation
 * Menstrual hygiene management

Waterborne diseases
Sources
 * 1) The article's content is relevant to the topic.
 * 2) Some parts of the article uses non-neutral language like "important" The "socioeconomic impact" section also contains biased language that could be improved to sound more objective.
 * 3) Most claims have citations, but not all.
 * 4) The article does not tackle one of Wiki's equity gaps.
 * 5) Talk about the article is that there isn't someone with a medical background or knowledge about the diseases in order to confirm the information in the article. They talk about the importance and potential of the article, but some don't want to waste or invest their time if there isn't validation.


 * Estimating the Burden of Disease Associated with Outbreaks Reported to the U.S. Waterborne Disease: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/hhra/recordisplay.cfm?deid=156410
 * https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/surveillance/investigating-reporting.html

Menstrual Hygiene Management

 * 1) The articles content is relevant to the topic.
 * 2) In the lead, there are tendencies to influence the reader into a certain view. The language, "despite it being a significant problem" takes away the readers' ability to decide what they deem as a "significant problem".
 * 3) There are areas where a claim is stated but there are no citations.
 * 4) This article tackles the Wikiproject Sanitation and woman hygiene.
 * 5) Talk in this article is just about the technical edits such as copyrights and how to cite content copied from other Wiki articles.