User:A.ssanchez6/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Andrea dei Mozzi

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I originally chose this article because we share the same name. Then I saw how short it was.

Lead Section

 * The lead includes a clear and concise introductory sentence.
 * There is no brief description of the article's major sections because there are no sections to begin with.
 * The lead is the article.

Content

 * The article's content is relevant to the topic.
 * The content is up to date.
 * This article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

 * The article is from a neutral point of view.
 * There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * The viewpoint acknowledging that in Dante's Comedy Andrea dei Mozzi is being punished with sodomites is not represented.
 * No minority of fringe viewpoints are described.
 * The article does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of any one viewpoint.

Sources and References

 * All facts in this article are backed up by a source.
 * The sources of this article are not thorough. There are more sources.
 * The sources are fairly current (21st century).
 * The sources on the article are not written by a diverse spectrum of authors.
 * Although the first source is not bad, it would be helpful to have a source in English with the same information (of which there definitely exists some).
 * All of the links to the sources work.
 * I do have a concern in the first source, as it appears that the Wikipedia article was lifted directly from it with little changes to wording (although it has been translated into English).

Organization and writing quality

 * The article is well written in that it is concise and easy to read.
 * There are no usage errors.
 * There is no organization because the article is a stub.

Images and Media

 * There are no images

Talk page discussion

 * There are no conversations in the talk age.
 * This article is rated as a stub. It is part of the WikiProject Biography.

Overall impressions

 * Overall, this article is a stub that needs more information.
 * The clarity of the language is the article's best strength.
 * This article is underdeveloped.