User:A1morales/Urban planning/Zattaras Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Alexandra (A1morales)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:A1morales/Urban_planning?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Urban planning

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead


 * I think you should update the current articles lead section to encompass the new information you added because currently you aren't editing it.

Content


 * The content does shed light on marginalized communities and people excluded in urban planning. The grammer is good as well. It also flows very well with other sections.

Tone and Balance


 * Tone is neutral for the most part but it could be improved by adding a counter argument for why some people don't thing urban planning is excluding people.

Sources and References


 * Sources are relatively current snd relevant. Maybe adding a couple more sources will make your work even better.

Organization


 * I like how you added a new section for the history of participatory urban planning instead of trying to fit it into an existing section. Also feel like you did a good job adding to sections in a way that flowed.

Images and Media


 * can use images and media to add to value of article

Overall Impression


 * Great job! Definitely added value and valuable information to the project. I think again you can add a bit more sources especially in the Criticisms and debates in urban planning section. And i think you did a great job organizing your article.