User:AB.cal/Decentralized wastewater system/Jbains03 Peer Review

General info
(provide username) AB.cal
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Decentralized wastewater system
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AB.cal/Decentralized wastewater system
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The content added was relevant to the topic, and the section included appropriate edits. There can be more edits made to add information that helps to fill in the gaps of knowledge. It currently seems that edits primarily alter the sentence structure, and are effortful inn making the content more concise. However, I would suggest attempting to add in information! For instance, maybe try adding or explaining more about the "different combinations and variations of hybrid systems". The completely new section that was added exhibits a neutral tonne, though it is difficult to understand the importance of this section based on what it written. I think it might be beneficial to include some more information in this section to connect it to a purpose and explain the extent of its importance in relation to the topic. Aside from these notes, the tone was neutral and I believed the flow of the edits was appropriate for the development oof the article.