User:AB.cal/Water supply and sanitation in Peru/Jbains03 Peer Review

General info
(provide username) AB.cal
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:AB.cal/Water supply and sanitation in Peru
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Water supply and sanitation in Peru

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The addition of the first new section seems super appropriate and contribute to the completion of the article! The tone is neutral and informative, and the sentence structure and flow is concise and complete. I wonder if the Reassertion section could be added to an existing section, as i'm unsure whether the content is sufficient enough to hold its own subheading? The inflammation within the section also doesn't seem to entirely add to the article in a way that changes the original information included in the article. The revised Ecoswell section also seems much more concise and feels like it adds more to the article now. The tone is good, and informative! Overall, I think the edits are good. The strength oof the edits added is they provide helpful background information and fill in gaps the original article failed to fill. However, I think there can be edits made in regards to the organization of this information to ensure each section is necessary.