User:ADGallo56/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Valerie Ashby

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because Valerie Ashby is an American chemist from underrepresented communities and who has a wikipedia page written more like a resume that needs to be improved to read more neutral.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section: The lead section clearly and concisely defines who Valerie Ashby is and what her current roles are. The section could be reworded to read less like a resume.

Content: The content is relevant and up-to-date, however not much about her science is listed. A section on her research would improve the page. She will be the first woman to be President at UMBC this summer.

Tone and Balance: The tone of the article is neutral.

Sources and References: The sources and references used are good, however some of the links no longer work.

Organization and Writing Quality: The article is concise, easy to read, and organized in a logical manner.

Images and Media: Only one image is used, a head shot of Valerie Ashby. The caption could be improved.

Talk Page Discussion: There was not much discussion, instead the creator of the page returned to rewrite some sections.

Overall Impressions: The page is in overall good status. It is neutrally written, with cited facts about Valerie Ashby. Addition of her research would improve the page.