User:ADeng102/Collegiate wrestling/Jblackman11 Peer Review

Lead:

I genuinely liked the article and found it to be a valuable addition to Wikipedia's coverage of the topic. The introduction has been updated to reflect the new content concerning the history and current status of women's collegiate wrestling. It provides insightful insights into the world of women's collegiate wrestling, offering a comprehensive overview of its evolution and current state. However, there is an opportunity to expand further and add more information. Specifically, providing more detailed information about key milestones and events in the history of women's collegiate wrestling, such as the founding of notable programs, the establishment of governing bodies, and significant rule changes over time, would enrich the reader's understanding of the sport's development.

Content:

The newly added content provides relevant and well-researched information about the history and current state of women's collegiate wrestling. I thought the article was good and effectively communicated the fundamentals of women's collegiate wrestling. The inclusion of historical background, current statistics, and rule differences between freestyle and folk style wrestling improves the article and enhances its comprehensiveness.

Tone and Balance:

The tone of the content remains neutral and informative, presenting factual information without bias.

Sources and References:

The content is backed up by citations from reliable sources, which is important for maintaining the credibility of the article on Wikipedia.

Organization:

The article is generally well-organized, with clear sections discussing the history, current status, and rules of women's collegiate wrestling. I found the article to be well-structured and easy to follow.

Images and Media:

No images or media were included. It could benefit from images to make the page more visually appealing.

Overall Impressions:

The article offers valuable insights into the world of women's collegiate wrestling and makes a commendable contribution to Wikipedia's coverage of the topic. I genuinely appreciated the full coverage of women's wrestling, which fills a significant gap in the previous article. However, there is room for improvement, and more information could be added to provide an even better understanding. Nevertheless, the article effectively educates readers about the history, present state, and rules of women's collegiate wrestling.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)