User:ADeng102/Collegiate wrestling/K Wilson12 Peer Review

General info

 * Give Feedback on the article.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article's topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything in this article is completely relevant to the topic. It expanded more on what the article was missing like women's wrestling. There were no distractions the article stayed on topic.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * This article stays neutral throughout the whole thing. They gave great facts about women's wrestling and were not biased towards Men's wrestling.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * the viewpoints that were made in this article were represented well they gave great information and talked about when they originated and how many teams there are today. This means they are keeping up with the times and give updates concerning women's wrestling.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The citations work very well and give great information that supports the claims of the article.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * All the information is up-to-date and is very relevant.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * ADeng102
 * Link to the draft you're reviewing:User:ADeng102/Collegiate wrestling
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Collegiate wrestling
 * Link to the draft you're reviewing:User:ADeng102/Collegiate wrestling
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Collegiate wrestling

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)