User:ADhist312/Himation/Dinnerghost Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ADhist312


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ADhist312/Himation


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Himation

Lead Section
The lead has not been edited. The original lead is clear and demonstrates why this article is important.

Clarity of Article Structure
The structure of this article is quite clear. The flow from 'origins' to 'how it was worn' then 'when it was worn' makes quite a bit of sense to me.

Adding a section on origins and a section on how the himations i worn is quite a definitely a good idea as it brings clarity, greater context and greater understanding to the original article.

Content Neutrality
The content is in a very neutral tone, well done.

Coverage Balance
The sections that you have added are well balanced and add to the topics importance.

Are there any other Perspectives to the himiation?

One that comes to mind for me is how was himation made?

Other comments
If possible, I think it would be good to add more images.

Overall, it's quite good!