User:AE339/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (Social science)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.This article is suppose to inform, so I believe it should be easier to find any mistakes.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes it does include a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, everything in the lead is later on discussed in further detail within the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I think it is just right, since it names everything and has links to the section discussing the particular term in detail.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, the content is relevant and also explains everything in detail.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes it is.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No I believe it has enough content.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Indeed.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic ? Proposed idea to merge with "Human Science"
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Yes, it is part of 13 different WikiProjects
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Wikipedia has a goal of providing the most accuarate and unbiased information on the internet so they undergo many revisions.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? The article is substantial but is still missing important content
 * What are the article's strengths? Good
 * How can the article be improved? Sources
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? It could be more developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: