User:AF1798/Pyrethrin/TrevorDriggers Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

AF1798


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AF1798/Pyrethrin?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead paragraph begins with two great introductory sentences and leads into what purposes the pyrethrin has in today's world. It explains pyrethrin's origins as well. Very short and to the point as it should be. On the other hand, it is missing the inclusion of what is said in the articles major section that is being added.

The content added is both relevant and up to date. It is relevant due to the main two pieces being added consist of the history of pyrethrins and its use as an insecticide. The content added belongs, and does not show any form of bias. It is neutral and informative. The "Use as insecticide" portion is longer than the "history" section, but this isn't an issue. This section should be longer than the other due to the different uses of pyrethrin and how it can be a repellent and insecticide.

Both sources are reliable and current with one of them being a general fact sheet about pyrethrins and their uses, and the other being an informative paper with extended information about their use and hazards. What is written represents what each article states and it accurately represents available literature. Although, there could be better information out there with more peer-reviewed journals. Lastly, all links work.

The content added is very well-written, and is concise and to the point with no grammatical or spelling errors. There were no images added, but that is no issue.

The added content does benefit the overall information about pyrethrins. The list of sources is not exhaustive, and what is added is quick and to the point. No excess or useless information.