User:AH1103 SAR/User:Jesslmc23/Margaret Garcia (artist)/AH1103 SAR Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jesslmc23


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jesslmc23/Margaret Garcia (artist)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is very concise. It describes her life and achievements. I would say that it is missing some info about her biography.

The content adds background information about the artist. The Chicano Art section doesn't describe the art just the artist's connection to it and how she implements some of it into her art. The sections were clear. Early Life and Color Palette take over the other sections. There is more information in those sections and it throws off the balance of the article. I feel the Chicano Art section needs more information because it is such an important part of art.

Your tone is neutral.

There are no sources in the Early Work section. Maybe it is possible to cite the link for The Center for Independent Living. If you add more information to the Chicano Art section, be sure to cite the source of your information. All your sources work and connect well.

Organization is well. There are some words missing in sentences. This can happen when typing out sentences while thinking of the wording.

I really like your article. It's easy to follow along.