User:AHunterL/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
James Kleist

I am evaluating the article over James Kleist.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it was something and someone random that I have never heard of before. I wanted to be completely unbiased. I feel that these articles have the proper and correct information, but the grammar and citing is what is very important to me. After reading the article, Kleist seems to be an interesting individual who assisted with the Roman Catholic religion. He was a German-American and helped with an English translation of the Bible. My impression of the article is that it is a smaller article, but gives all the key information that someone would be looking for if researching James Kleist.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is done well. The initial, opening sentence gives the main and most important information about James Kleist. The lead sentence is also short enough that it does not give too much information, making the lead sentence too much and overwhelming. The lead sentence also gives us information that is expanded on further within the article. The article content goes over all the main and important information about James Kleist. The article content is as current as it can be, last being updated in October 2021. The article certainly depicts an individual that is not well known or recorded within history very often; the records are also not easily accessible from what I have looked into. All of the information that is provided about Kleist is relevant to himself. The article is completely neutral throughout and provides factual information that cannot be changed or confused. There are thorough sources that are cited throughout the article. Overall, I think this article is well done and provides a good amount of information about Kleist.