User:AJS2016/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Cyberbullying)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I chose this article because I have had students in my school that have dealt with cyberbullying. As the mother of a 6 year old, being informed is important. My feeling about this article at first glance was that it is clear about what cyberbullying is as far as a definition goes and provides some examples)

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:

The lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.

The article does give a brief description of the major sections. I did not notice any information that was not present in the article.

I think the lead it not overly detailed, I think it gives the information in a manner that is to the point and easy to comprehend.

Content:

The content of the article is relevant to the topic. The article is up to date, it was last edited on August 23, 2022

There isn't any content missing but there is some content that may not belong. Under research for preventative legislation there is a exclamation point next to words that say that the section could possibly contain original research.

Tone and Balance:

The article appears to be neutral, I don't see people's opinions in it. I do think this article focuses more on teens or older youth in reference to cyberbullying. It does mention middle school kids but there is more research leaning towards teens.

Sources and references:

I'm having a little trouble on knowing how to identify a second source and the questions following appear to be referring to secondary sources. I did click view sources and there were a lot of sources when I scrolled down but I do not know if that is what I was supposed to do.

I clicked on a few links and they did work.

Organization and writing quality;

There were some spelling mistakes and some grammatical mistakes but there were not too many.

The article is easy to read and reflects the major points.

Images and Media:

The article does have images that are clear and well captioned. The images are laid out in an appealing way. The images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

Talk page discussion;

I did not find any discussions going on but I did find where it was asked for a source to not be flagged as a copyright violation.

The article is rated: WikiProject Internet(Rated C-class-High importance/ WikiProject Law(Rated C-class Mid importance/WikiProject Crime(Rated C-class, Mid-importance)

Overall impression:

Overall I think the article is well put together. There are many different sections so there are a lot of different things to learn about in reference to cyberbullying. I do think that it could use more examples of kids younger than the teenage years experiencing or inciting cyberbullying. I think there are a lot of things to learn from the article.