User:AKort24/Jacqueline Jones Royster/DThatcher99 Peer Review

Hi Ms. Korthaus,

There is no lead in your sandbox (idk what this is and I don't have one either)...(We must have missed something in class)...(If we're gonna struggle at least it's in unison)...

Your content that is in the sandbox thus far seems good. I do like the subheadings you have included and think they will be a great organization to the end result, and as you are creating an article from scratch it is good information to begin with.

I think, for the nature of the Wikipedia articles, you might want to put a citation after the dates (2010-2019), even if it feels repetitive.

I think (maybe I'm wrong I don't really know) that instead of "Bachelor" you need to put "Bachelor's" for her education.

I remember Dr. Thomas talking about how info in an article will link to a different article--but I don't remember if we have to add the hyperlinks or if they happen naturally as it's picked up by the system...if it's something you have to add then it might be good and make it more fitting for the Wikipedian culture and expectations to link to the universities she went to, and to her books you have listed. (Lots of work but I believe in you)

The only concern I have when looking at your citation list is the prabook.com, it doesn't seem to hold much integrity. But I know you were having some difficulty finding information last we spoke so it might just be what it is. ---Though, as I look at it again it is a "trademark of World Biographical Encyclopedia Inc.", so maybe it's okay?

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)