User:AKort24/Jacqueline Jones Royster/Jadams46 Peer Review

General info
AKort24
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AKort24/Jacqueline Jones Royster
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)'

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Although there isn't a lead, I think the biography portion will be taken into consideration. I believe that this section covers all the essential elements for a biography, therefore it's a wonderful place to start. The background information provided by the author about the subject of their work is excellent. As already stated This is off to a wonderful start, and the substance is strong. There has been a ton of information provided thus far. However, she can delve much further into more.The reader can observe how the author use her research and find out where she obtained the material by following the author's extensive use of citations and sources. The tone reads as a description in terms of voice and style. This draft is easy to read, and the author did an excellent job organizing the piece. It's a fantastic method to learn more about the person of the article and their works after getting to know them personally. Although there aren't any pictures in the story yet, there ought to be at least one of the woman it's about. The article's inventiveness will be enhanced if visuals are included. Overall, everything about the post is excellent, and I wouldn't change a thing. As previously stated, I will go into further detail. Give us more information about the books, for instance. I am aware that there is more to say about the woman, but this is only a draft. Continue the fantastic job.