User:ALeverich/sandbox

For this week we had peer review to asses and consider as we worked to further our articles. This feed back I took from this peer review session was:

 * 1) Spelling: I definitely had spelling issues. I have a mild form of dyslexia and I was very happy that my peers pointed these mistakes out to me because I initially didn’t see anything wrong.
 * 2) ”Although the article is not very long or in depth yet, I feel a bias towards the betterment and safety of the animals and plants. This is because of how thorough the author dives into endangered species and how the DMZ is assisting them.” This suggestion by one of my reviewees was very helpful because I do feel a strong connection to these animals and I will have to go in and make sure I am providing unbiased information for the readers. Thank you for pointing this out to me. There are many things I didn’t notice about my writing that I have know been notified about.
 * 3) Information: For some sections on my article I feel I am lacking and I tried to supplement that with adding links to my article so that readers can check these links for more background information. However. I do hope to improve my writing to the point where I don’t need as many links as I have initially used.
 * 4) Sources: Many of my reviewees said I had good Sources so I’m happy to hear that I have provided enough information to draw from in order to inform the readers. However, as I mentioned I am not that great a writing the information out well enough to show the overall meaning. I hope I did a good job so far but I will continue to improve the more I edit my article.

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Korea Train Express


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article seems to have a great source base but could use some more Design information. This article is part of two wikiprojects, Wikiproject Korea, with a C-class rating in the project and it is of mild importance. The second project is Wikiproject Trains, this is a C-class and high important project. I intend to find more useful information involving the preliminary designs of the train and how it functions at such high speeds.


 * Sources
 * Preliminary design of the KTX management system
 * Capability assessment of the equilibrium field system in KTX
 * Verification and optimization of vacuum vessel supports design in KTX

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Wildlife of South Korea


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article has a good source base but I think I could add more about native animals in the region. It's part of many wikiprojects like wikiproject Korea and wikiproject environment, ect. It also hold a C-class quality and ranges from high to mid level of importance. I want to improve on the information of native spices in the region along with some information on the habitats. Maybe also include invasive species?


 * Sources
 * The fish fauna of mountain streams in South Korean national parks and its significance to conservation of regional freshwater fish biodiversity.
 * Characteristics and habitats of non‐native plant species in the city of Chonju, southern Korea.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Cinema of South Korea


 * Article Evaluation

This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force and is part of wikiprojects Korea and wikiprojects film. It may have a conflict of interest, but I would like to work on changing that (hopefully) I also think it can use a pop culture influence section because a lot of films are influenced by the current trends in Korea. I also think that adding how movie viewings have changed would be helpful. I think it has good sources, but they could be looked at a little closer. Maybe more scholarly sources or peer reviewed articles.


 * Sources
 * Virtual hallyu : Korean cinema of the global era.
 * Promoting intercultural sensitivity through New Korean Cinema films.
 * Movie migrations : transnational genre flows and South Korean cinema.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources