User:AMLeeward/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Zoology

(Provide a link to the article here.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this article to evaluate because, I want to learn more about the general idea of Zoology. It matters to me because it expands my knowledge and understanding for the subject of Zoology. My first impressions on the article is that the history of Zoology dated back centuries ago, and ever since then the information of Zoology grew.

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
Everything in the article is relevant to the topic, it gives information about the study of Zoology and why is it so important for scientists to understand more about plants, animals and all living things on Earth. There was nothing distracting me. The date of the information ranges from the 90's to 2020, I believe that the information is out of date. I think newer content should be added. I do not see any notable equity gaps, and I believe that the article represents historically marginalized populations. I think more pictures about the topic should be added. The article is neutral, both sides of the topic are equally explained and provided information for. All viewpoints are represented thoroughly. The links for citations work, and they support the claims that were provided. Facts in the article were all cited from reliable references, and come from reliable sources. The sources used were neutral and not biased. Sources that were used came from various authors and publishers in the field of Zoology.

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)