User:AMLeeward/Smaragdinella calyculata/Svnnvs Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

AMLeeward


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AMLeeward/Smaragdinella_calyculata?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article
 * Smaragdinella calyculata

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.) ￼ I think the order of how you're writing it down is good. starting with introducing the species and moving onto the description and so on.
 * 2) Okay, thanks!
 * 3) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? ￼ I think the grammar is pretty good.
 * 4) * Thanks!
 * 5) Check the main points of the article:
 * 6) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) She mentions it in the taxonomy
 * 7) * Thanks!
 * 8) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? yes
 * 9) * Thanks!
 * 10) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? Move the information under taxonomy to the top using it as an introduction. And take off the taxonomy since the information is in the box on the right side of the original article.
 * 11) * Okay!
 * 12) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) yes
 * 13) * Thanks!
 * 14) Check the sources:
 * 15) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? no
 * 16) * I will make sure to do that!
 * 17) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? yes
 * 18) * Thanks!
 * 19) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? yes
 * 20) * Thanks!
 * 21) * What is the quality of the sources? some sources are good.
 * 22) * Thanks!
 * 23) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 24) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? Move the taxonomy information in the introduction section (Lead).
 * 25) * Okay!
 * 26) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? No. I think you could improve the reference list. Make sure the same reference isn't put down more than once. Also,
 * 27) * Thanks!
 * 28) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? ￼ Reference list. Always go back to the wiki practices assignments that teach how to improve your article if you need help.
 * 29) Okay!
 * 30) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?