User:AMYCREYNOLDS/Single Cell Assay/AMYCREYNOLDS Peer Review

Peer review of Single -Cell Analysis by Asgnia
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

Peer Review Instructions:  Produce a summary of your findings. Copy the questions below to your Peer review page. IGNORE THE TEMPLATE that is pre-loaded on the Peer Review feedback page Add your answers in bold (300 words minimum).


 * 1) Is it obvious to you which sections of the article have been revised? Is the new content relevant to the topic? No, it is not obvious which sections have been revised. The sections are not labeled as what is from the original article and what is new. However, I saw on the peer-review assignment sheet that the section about Associated Technologies was a new section. To make it clear for future peer reviewers, be sure to distinguish between old and new material within the sandbox so the reviewer does not have to switch back and forth between the article and the sandbox .

'''However, the new content added "Associated Technologies" is relevant to the topic because it further explains the techniques used in single-cell isolation. I like that the information is explained all on one page, rather than having to click the link for each technology to determine what it does.'''

2. What does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any particular information that you found especially informative.

3. What overall adjustments do you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know.

5. Is all new content backed up by a reliable source of information?

6. Are the sources fairly current (> 2015)? Check a few links. Do they work?

7. Summarize any typographical/grammatical errors that you found.

8. Student authors are responsible for all images on their page (even if not part of their revised subsection). Double check the original page to make sure images are acceptable and clearly described. See associated tutorial to review Wiki image requirements. Summarize your findings.

9. Identify at least one additional reference that you think may contribute to the article. Explain why you think this article would benefit from the new information. Be sure to provide the reference in your write-up.

FINALLY: Add the questions above with your answers to the peer review page associated with your classmate’s article'''. IGNORE THE TEMPLATE''' that is pre-loaded on the Peer Review feedback page. For full credit on this assignment, thoughtful answers must be provided to each of the points above. The minimum word count for answers is 300 words.