User:AMaizing2021/Chemosensory Speciation/MarleyMae21 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

AMaizing2021


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Chemosensory speciation

Evaluate the drafted changes
For the lead section, I thought it did a nice of job of outlining what chemosensory speciation is and what the rest of the article would be on. One tip I would add is to maybe split that last sentence into 2 sentences. It was a little long with all the semicolons so it would just make it easier to read, in my opinion. Other than that, I felt like the lead section was not misleading or too detailed and was well written!

I thought the content was super interesting! I think it was written in a way that most people could read the article and still be able to get an idea of the topic even if they weren't specialists. One tip I would give is in the first section on "Resource Identification", maybe leave out the phrase "A recent publication". I think it might flow better that way in my opinion, plus the term "recent" won't always apply after the article is live for a few years. Either way, the content section was really informative and written in a neutral tone! I thought all of the subheadings corresponded well with the content in the section. I also liked the examples used, like the lizard example in the last section! They were appropriate and helpful.

Overall, I really enjoyed reading this, so great job!! I didn't run across any sentences where I was unsure of what you meant so I think the article is very clear as well!. I thought it was organized well. To improve, you might consider adding a picture to give the reader something to visualize in their head while they read the article, plus it makes the article look more complete!