User:AMousou/Medium ground finch/Peanutbutters11 Peer Review

General info
Ayahbear127, Fevans9, AMousou
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AMousou/Medium_ground_finch?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template :Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Medium ground finch

Lead
I will only be reviewing the article as it is since there has been little to no changes within the article from the group members. The first paragraph of the lead was quick and precise, however the second paragraph on the lead needs to be changed. The topic should of inbreeding depression should not be discussed in some detail within the lead. That entire paragraph would be taken out of the article and moved into a sub section. It is the only overly detailed part within the lead. Overall the lead did touch on everything that was further talked about in the article.

Content
The content is not up to date with the latest article being from 2021 and majority of the articles are from the early 2000's. Since this is the case, I'm sure that this wikipedia page is not up to date. The content included is relevant to medium ground finches however, subsections such as habitat and range can be elaborated more on. This article does not deal with Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance
The content added is neutral and there was no heavily bias or persuasion in the article.

Sources and References
All the sources and references are backed up by a secondary or reliable source of information. However, newer sources would be better for this article. As stated before, most of the information was from the early 2000's. I would be skeptical if all my information was almost a decade or two older. The resources do reflect the topic information with most of the links working. The main issue is introducing more resources, but from your sandbox you have newer articles.

Organization
The content has been concise and clear. It is straight forward and easy to read. As of right now, I dont see any spelling errors in the article. The article has been broken down to different sub headings, but there could be more added to each one. There was already one part which connected urban ecology, but more can be added than that one sentence. Under behavior, you can also add how there mating process rather than under the description portion of the article.

Images and Media
The article does include images that enhances my understanding on the topic. The captions are short: only labeling the difference between a male or female medium ground finch. I believe they have to cite there pictures so as of right now, they do not adhere to wikipedia's copyright regulations. There should be more pictures added like there nest, there children, and even more specific locations besides the one picture shown. The photo showing the location doesn't even have citations or captions tied to it.

Overall Impressions
Since no content (besides one correction) was added to the article, I cannot comment on the improvement of the article. However by looking through your sandbox, I was able to see the possible additions to your topic including more information on urban ecology. The wikipedia page is not complete and there is a lot of information that can be touched on (which I saw on your sandbox what you'll be adding which is good for this page).