User:ANIKAA26/Sandbox/Article Evaluation

Discrimination based on Hair Texture

Was the article relevant to the article topic? Yes and no, I say this because the article topic is based on the discrimination of hair texture and the leading paragraph does not fuller makes that clear. The content list is all over the place and it did not speak clearly to me. I feel like the article is as neutral as the person who wrote it. Definitely would reword a lot of the contents sections and add in some hard facts. All viewpoints are underrepresented. It looks like someone just rushed this article. This article is missing evidence that proves that discrimination towards hair texture has been made a law in multiple state laws in the United States. The information that is provided in this article is not up to date and needs to add in the more recent times of discrimination towards hair texture. There needs to be information on how black women have been reclaiming their hair in Locks form or Afro form to be welcomed in the professional areas.