User:ANON of IBID, Son of Shrdlu/sandbox

When providing information on people, especially public figures, and those who are part of the 1% of our population estimated to own or control 99% of the nation's wealth, operate either major consumer-supply corporations, major media giants, or allege charitable foundations, physical and e-mail addresses to reach them (well, obviously, their aides), perhaps even business telephone numbers [I would consider home addresses beyond "...In addition to his home/office at the White House (e-mail, switchboard number, and home) Trump maintains residences at [whatever Trump Towers (e-mail), his "Mar-a-Largo" golf club in ______, Florida (business phone and e-mail) etc. etc. etc.)

The purpose is to provide a semi-direct link which will, at the least, be counted. For Instance: The publisher and First Families of the New York Times CANNOT be reached by calling its general number 212-556-1234, for they are NOT in the directory of the computerized "operator".

While providing no "targeting" information for stalkers that is NOT in the public domain, the Wikipedia Foundation could provide an easy method to reach out to People in Power, for instance, though Trump probably does not read his e-mail, every WH has kept score on major issues and presented aides with data like Tax Overhaul: Like n; percentage daily's respondents p%, percentage respondents since (important date) p% estimated degree of passion (1-100) np. Dislike, n; percentage daily's respondents p%, percentage respondents since (important date) p% estimated degree of passion (1-100) np., undecided seeking information n; percentage daily's respondents p%, percentage respondents since (important date) p% estimated degree of passion (1-100) np.

I write this because I called Amazon with reports of a letter apparently representing a 0-day threat to either those ignorant enough to push the button for a "free $50 Amazon gift card", asked for IT Security, so someone THERE could get out a laptop to see what happened, and prevent tarring the company with the effects of a 'black-hat'.

No can do, supervisors in India said, directing me to send relevant data to stop-phishing [something like that]@amazon.com. In all, I wasted an hour protecting the reputation of one of the world's largest retail giants AND the damage to untold thousands of appliance-computers owned by those who should get at least an introductory printed manual with each laptop or smart phone they purchase.

I was not going to get out my personal dangerous-spam-tracking gear on my own protected machine, outside the routers of my small 'net organization to help Amazon do its job - I wanted to protect my 87-year-old mother from accidentally pushing the wrong button (I've taught her to at least get me before she does)

Got a form letter back - OK call it personal, but until internet access requires at least the same amount of training required of auto drivers, this kind of info provides people with a chance to at least contact the Wealthy and Powerful without causing them harm in any way, and shortcuts searches appliance-computer users do not understand how to make. Eatoin