User:ASUpsychlaw/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Forensic psychology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This page has a lot of room for improvement. It is incomplete in many ways, and prioritizes some things in odd ways (e.g, the psychological autopsy section is about 1/3 of the entire article - this is not reflective of the field). There's a lot missing here, sourcing is inadequate, and it's an important landing page for people in many ways. So, it's a high-impact page to evaluate (and to edit).

Evaluate the article
The content: THe psychological autopsy part was much too long. HIstory section is missing a lot and can be bolstered - also images could be added. Jenkins case matters for how forensic psych differs by country. Pop culture section could include cases on Netflix (Lori Vallow, I just Killed my Dad, Making a Murderer). Training & Education section - add a section on what people can do at a master's level? Other countries experiences not really represented well on this page and could be enhanced. Definition of forensic psych in the lead section needed some work. Common types of evals sections needs a lot of work (missing a lot). Need to rework the "comptence" section. Need to rework the other types of evals section and add citation to Neal, Mathers, Frizzell? Further Readings needs work. Notable rsearch in forensic psych needs work. Salary section only sourced a blog and could be updated with real information.

Talk page and optional activity: I checked the talk page - not too much going on here. There is another class doing editing of this page this term (good). I deleted an old discussion that was like 15 years out of date and is totally irrelevant to the page now. I also added some talk about what I think needs work on the page. THe article is currently rated a "C".