User:AT WIKI AT/Nureddin al-Atassi/Dinomonke33 Peer Review

General info
(AT WIKI AT)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AT%20WIKI%20AT/Nureddin_al-Atassi?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Nureddin al-Atassi

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? no it has not but there is no reason ron revise the lead.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does .
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The already existing lead is good.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is rather concise and brief.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes it is as it talks about his education and upbringing in detail.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? The content seems up to date and factual.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All content is present and relevant.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? yes because there wasent much that was talked or referenced regarding Nureddin al-Atassi.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The content is neutral and ubiased.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There are no unbiased claims
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? All information regrading perspective and representation seem to be well present in the article.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No it does not as the information in the article is very neutral.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? no
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? the sources do.
 * Are the sources current? the sources provided are current.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? the sources seem to have relevant info and authors.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes the article is easy and simple to read
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? there are no grammatical mistakes.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes the relevant sections are separated and nothing spills into each other.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media no media added.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Overall relevant information was added.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content delves more into the presidents early life and education showing the route to his political aspirations.
 * How can the content added be improved? all information given in the edits are relevant and comprehensive.