User:AVB227/Multimodal Composition/DThatcher99 Peer Review

Again, this is a working draft so I know there will be more sections to come. But, so far the headings/subheadings are good.

General info
AVB227
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AVB227/Multimodal Composition:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is there and seems to reflect what Alyssa has edited. The first sentence works well as an introductory statement. It does not offer a brief breakdown of the articles sections, but that is something I cannot see being done at this stage--just remember to come back to it as you finish. The lead is not overly detailed, it seems appropriate.

The content added does feel appropriate to the topic at hand. The content that has been added is up to date, it even includes information from recent world events such as Covid-19. I have not done much research on this topic myself, so I am not sure what information might be missing, what is included does seem to belong.

The content added thus far does not seem to hold any bias, Alyssa is writing in a neutral way.

While Alyssa was away, we discussed in class that Wiki articles need more citations than usual writing. A citation should ideally be added every 1-3 sentences. The sources in her list thus far do seem appropriate.

The content added is well written. This is a draft, so some spelling/grammar mistakes are to be expected, but just make sure you give it another read.

I know more headings/subheadings will come as you continue to work, but so far the ones you have made look good.