User:AVB227/Multimodal Composition/Jadams46 Peer Review

General info
User:AVB227
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AVB227/Multimodal Composition
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead provides useful information on the topic of the article. The first sentence works well as an opening statement. The thesis statement is revealed in the first and second sentences. Readers can infer enough about the topic of the article from the lead. Continue revisiting and revising it as you proceed toward the final draft. Thus far, the article's content is going well, and the author is going in the right direction. Even if this post is still in draft form, I'm sure the author will have a satisfying conclusion because, as someone who doesn't know anything about it, you can still learn a lot from it thus far. Thus far, the article's tone has been impartial. Thus far, the article appears to be neutral. The author makes good use of her sources, which appear to be reliable and appreciated. The post is simple to read and comprehend, and the way she organized it fits the content perfectly thus far. Keep up the fine work; considering that this is only a draft, you are moving in the correct direction.