User:AVee65/Atherinomorus insularum/Palma AJ Peer Review

Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

AVee65


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AVee65/Atherinomorus insularum


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Atherinomorus insularum

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? One thing I liked about the article is how some history about the fish is included.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) There are no separate sections of information about the fish. I believe the writing style if appropriate for this article.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? There are no references and citations numbers after the sentences.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Like as mentioned before, there are no references and citations. The article would be greatly improved if there are subtitles and information that goes along with it. One thing that I can take away from this article is adding some history about my fish like how you did. I liked that you added the story of how ancient Hawaiians would rub this fish on their face for human sacrificial victims. (Artesia Ve'e: Hey Palma AJ, I agree with your review on my article. There's so much work needed to be done for my article to be good. Looking forward to adding more information to my article to attract more readers. I also forgot to include my references due to the timing but thank you for your honest review. Mahalo!)