User:AWayneB/Evaluate an Article

The article I assigned to myself is overall written well, and correctly follows Wikipedia guidelines, however it does contain content gaps. It has good sources cited correctly, neutral tone, and a balanced point of view. The organization is simple and precise. My goal in editing this article is plainly to add new information from good sources, at an attempt to fill some of the article's content gaps.

Which article are you evaluating?
Western hoolock gibbon

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it was written and organized well, so it did not need a complete overhaul, but it does contain some content caps which can be filled with available data.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of this article is short and precise, and fits the content well. The article has a neutral tone, and a balanced point of view. The organization of the article is simple yet effective, and is overall written well. It contains good sources which are cited correctly. This article does however, lack available information, leading to content gaps.